Original
Guideline on diagnostic procedures for suspected hypersensitivity to beta-lactam antibiotics
Gerda Wurpts, Werner Aberer, Heinrich Dickel, Randolf Brehler, Thilo Jakob, Burkhard Kreft, Vera Mahler, Hans F. Merk, Norbert Mülleneisen, Hagen Ott, Wolfgang Pfützner, Stefani Röseler, Franziska Ruëff, Helmut Sitter, Cord Sunderkötter, Axel Trautmann, Regina Treudler, Bettina Wedi, Margitta Worm, und Knut Brockow
Volume 4 (2020) p. 11 - 43
Abstract
Allergologie select, Vol. 4/2020 (11-43)
Guideline on diagnostic procedures for suspected hypersensitivity to beta-lactam antibiotics
Gerda Wurpts1, Werner Aberer2, Heinrich Dickel3, Randolf Brehler4, Thilo Jakob5, Burkhard Kreft6, Vera Mahler7,8, Hans F. Merk1, Norbert Mülleneisen9, Hagen Ott10, Wolfgang Pfützner11, Stefani Röseler1, Franziska Ruëff12, Helmut Sitter13, Cord Sunderkötter6, Axel Trautmann14, Regina Treudler15, Bettina Wedi16, Margitta Worm17, und Knut Brockow18
1Clinic for Dermatology and Allergology, Aachen Comprehensive Allergy Center (ACAC), Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Germany 2Department of Dermatology, Graz Medical University, Graz, Austria, 3Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, St. Josef Hospital, University Hospital of the Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, 4Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, 5Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Gießen und Marburg, Gießen Site, Gießen, 6Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University, Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), 7Paul-Ehrlich Institute, Langen, 8Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, 9Asthma and Allergy Centre, Leverkusen, 10Division of Pediatric Dermatology and Allergology, Auf der Bult Children’s Hospital, Hannover, 11Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Gießen und Marburg, Marburg Site, Marburg, 12Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, 13Institute of Surgical Research, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, 14Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Allergy Center Mainfranken, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, 15Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology and Leipzig Interdisciplinary Center for Allergology – LICA-CAC, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, 16Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Comprehensive Allergy Center, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, 17Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Allergy Center Charité (ACC), Berlin, and 18Department of Dermatology and Allergology am Biederstein, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
This guideline on diagnostic procedures for suspected beta-lactam antibiotic (BLA) hypersensitivity was written by the German and Austrian professional associations for allergology, and the Paul-Ehrlich Society for Chemotherapy in a consensus procedure according to the criteria of the German Association of Scientific Medical Societies. BLA such as penicillins and cephalosporins represent the drug group that most frequently triggers drug allergies. However, the frequency of reports of suspected allergy in patient histories clearly exceeds the number of confirmed cases. The large number of suspected BLA allergies has a significant impact on, e.g., the quality of treatment received by the individual patient and the costs to society as a whole. Allergies to BLA are based on different immunological mechanisms and often manifest as maculopapular exanthema, as well as anaphylaxis; and there are also a number of less frequent special clinical manifestations of drug allergic reactions. All BLA have a beta-lactam ring. BLA are categorized into different classes: penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, monobactams, and beta-lactamase inhibitors with different chemical structures. Knowledge of possible cross-reactivity is of considerable clinical significance. Whereas allergy to the common beta-lactam ring occurs in only a small percentage of all BLA allergic patients, cross-reactivity due to side chain similarities, such as aminopenicillins and aminocephalosporins, and even methoxyimino cephalosporins, are more common. However, the overall picture is complex and its elucidation may require further research. Diagnostic procedures used in BLA allergy are usually made up of four components: patient history, laboratory diagnostics, skin testing (which is particularly important), and drug provocation testing. The diagnostic approach – even in cases where the need to administer a BLA is acute – is guided by patient history and risk – benefit ratio in the individual case. Here again, further studies are required to extend the present state of knowledge. Performing allergy testing for suspected BLA hypersensitivity is urgently recommended not only in the interests of providing the patient with good medical care, but also due to the immense impact of putative BLA allergies on society as a whole.Correspondence to:
Dr. med. Gerda Wurpts, Clinic for Dermatology and Allergology, Aachen Comprehensive Allergy Center (ACAC), Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
Email: [email protected]
Guideline
S3 Guideline Allergy Prevention
Matthias V. Kopp, Cathleen Muche-Borowski, Michael Abou-Dakn, Birgit Ahrens, Kirsten Beyer, Katharina Blümchen, Petra Bubel, Adam Chaker, Monika Cremer, Regina Ensenauer, Michael Gerstlauer, Uwe Gieler, Inga-Marie Hübner, Fritz Horak, Ludger Klimek, Berthold V. Koletzko, Sybille Koletzko, Susanne Lau, Thomas Lob-Corzilius, Katja Nemat, Eva M.J. Peters, Antonio Pizzulli†, Imke Reese, Claudia Rolinck-Werninghaus, Elien Rouw, Bianca Schaub, Sebastian Schmidt, Jens-Oliver Steiß, Anne Kathrin Striegel, Zsolt Szépfalusi, Dietmar Schlembach, Thomas Spindler, Christian Taube, Valérie Trendelenburg, Regina Treudler, Ulrich Umpfenbach, Christian Vogelberg, Martin Wagenmann, Anke Weißenborn, Thomas Werfel, Margitta Worm, Helmut Sitter, and Eckard Hamelmann
Volume 6 (2022) p. 61 - 97
Abstract
Allergologie select, Vol. 6/2022 (61-97)
S3 Guideline Allergy Prevention
Matthias V. Kopp1, Cathleen Muche-Borowski2, Michael Abou-Dakn3, Birgit Ahrens4, Kirsten Beyer5, Katharina Blümchen4, Petra Bubel6, Adam Chaker7, Monika Cremer8, Regina Ensenauer9, Michael Gerstlauer10, Uwe Gieler11, Inga-Marie Hübner12, Fritz Horak13, Ludger Klimek14, Berthold V. Koletzko15, Sybille Koletzko16, Susanne Lau5, Thomas Lob-Corzilius17, Katja Nemat18, Eva M.J. Peters11, Antonio Pizzulli†19, Imke Reese20, Claudia Rolinck-Werninghaus21, Elien Rouw22, Bianca Schaub23, Sebastian Schmidt24, Jens-Oliver Steiß25, Anne Kathrin Striegel26, Zsolt Szépfalusi27, Dietmar Schlembach28, Thomas Spindler29, Christian Taube30, Valérie Trendelenburg5, Regina Treudler31, Ulrich Umpfenbach32, Christian Vogelberg33, Martin Wagenmann34, Anke Weißenborn35, Thomas Werfel36, Margitta Worm37, Helmut Sitter38, and Eckard Hamelmann39
1Airway Research Center North, University of Lübeck, Member of Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Universitätsklinik für Kinderheilkunde, Inselspital, Bern, Schweiz, 2Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland, 3Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, St. Joseph-Krankenhaus Berlin-Tempelhof, Deutschland, 4Children’s Hospital, University Hospital Frankfurt, Deutschland, 5Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Deutschland, 6HNO-Facharztpraxis, Eisleben, Deutschland, 7HNO-Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Deutschland, 8Ökotrophologin, Journalistin, Idstein/Taunus, Deutschland, 9Institut für Kinderernährung, Max Rubner-Institut, Karlsruhe, Deutschland, 10Kinderklinik, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Deutschland, 11Klinik für Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie des UKGM, Universitätsklinik, Giessen, Deutschland, 12Arbeitsgemeinschaft Dermatologiche Prävention e.V., Hamburg, Deutschland, 13Allergiezentrum Wien West, Wien, Österreich, 14Zentrum für Rhinologie und Allergologie, Wiesbaden, Deutschland, 15Integriertes Sozialpädiatrisches Zentrum, Dr. von Haunerschen Kinderspital, LMU Klinikum der Universität München, München, Deutschland, 16Abteilung für Stoffwechsel und Ernährung, Dr. von Haunersches Kinderspital, LMU Klinikum der Universität München, München, Deutschland, 17Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Christliches Kinderhospital Osnabrück, Deutschland, 18Kinderzentrum Dresden-Friedrichstadt, Dresden, Deutschland, 19Schwerpunktpraxis für Allergologie und Lungenheilkunde im Kinder- und Jugendalter, Berlin, Deutschland, 20Ernährungsberatung und -therapie mit Schwerpunkt Allergologie, München, Deutschland, 21Praxis für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Teltow, Deutschland, 22Kinderarztpraxis, Bühl, Deutschland, 23Asthma- und Allergieambulanz, Dr. von Haunersches Kinderspital, LMU Klinikum der Universität, München, Deutschland, 24Allgemeine Pädiatrie, Klinik und Poliklinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Deutschland, 25Facharztpraxis für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Fulda, Deutschland, 26Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Universitätsklinikum, Köln, Deutschland, 27Universitätsklinik für Kinder- und Jugendheilkunde, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich, 28Klinik für Geburtsmedizin, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, 29Hochgebirgsklinik Davos, Schweiz, 30Klinik für Pneumologie, Ruhrlandklinik, Westdeutsches Lungenzentrum am Universitätsklinikum, Essen, Deutschland, 31Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Leipziger Allergie-Centrum LICA – CAC, Universitätsmedizin, Leipzig, Deutschland, 32Praxis für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Dülken, Deutschland, 33Klinik und Poliklinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität, Dresden, Deutschland, 34HNO-Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland, 35German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Deutschland, 36Klinik für Dermatologie, Allergologie und Venerologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland, 37Klinik für Dermatologie, Allergologie und Venerologie, Campus Charité Mitte, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland, 38Institut für Chirurgische Forschung, Philipps-Universität, Marburg, Deutschland, and 39Kinder-Zentrum Bethel, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, Universitätsklinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Universitätsklinikum OWL, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Deutschland
Background: The persistently high prevalence of allergic diseases in Western industrial nations and the limited possibilities of causal therapy make evidence-based recommendations for primary prevention necessary. Methods: The recommendations of the S3 Guideline Allergy Prevention, published in its last version in 2014, were revised and consented on the basis of a current systematic literature search. The evidence search was conducted for the period 06/2013 – 11/2020 in the electronic databases Cochrane and MEDLINE, as well as in the reference lists of current reviews and through references from experts. The literature found was screened in two filtering processes, first by title and abstract, and the remaining papers were screened in the full text for relevance. The studies included were sorted by level of evidence, and the study quality was indicated in terms of potential bias (low/high). The revised recommendations were formally agreed and consented upon with the participation of representatives of the relevant professional societies and (self-help) organizations (nominal group process). Of 5,681 hits, 286 studies were included and assessed. Results: Recommendations on maternal nutrition during pregnancy and breastfeeding as well as on infant nutrition in the first months of life again play an important role in the updated guideline: Many of the previous recommendations were confirmed by the current data. It was specified that breastfeeding should be exclusive for the first 4 – 6 months after birth, if possible, and that breastfeeding should continue with the introduction of complementary foods. A new recommendation is that supplementary feeding of cow’s milk-based infant formula should be avoided in the first days of life if the mother wishes to breastfeed. Furthermore, it was found that the evidence for a clear recommendation for hydrolyzed infant formula in nonbreastfed infants at risk of atopic diseases is currently insufficient. It is therefore recommended to check whether an infant formula with proven efficacy, demonstrated in allergy prevention studies, is available until the introduction of complementary feeding. Finally, based on the EAACI guideline, recommendations were made for the prevention of hen’s egg allergy by introducing and regularly giving thoroughly heated (e.g., baked or hard-boiled) but not “raw” hen’s egg (also no scrambled egg) with the complementary food. The recommendation to introduce peanut in complementary feeding was formulated cautiously for the German-speaking countries: In families with regular peanut consumption, the regular administration of peanut-containing foods in ageappropriate form (e.g., peanut butter) with the complementary diet can be considered for the primary prevention of peanut allergy in infants with atopic dermatitis (AD). Before introduction, a clinically relevant peanut allergy must be ruled out, especially in infants with moderate to severe AD. There is still insufficient evidence for an allergy-preventive efficacy of prebiotics or probiotics, vitamin D, or other vitamins in the form of supplements so that recommendations against their supplementation were adopted for the first time in the current guideline. Biodiversity plays an important role in the development of immunological tolerance to environmental and food allergens: there is clear evidence that growing up on a farm is associated with a lower risk of developing asthma and allergic diseases. This is associated with early non-specific immune stimulation due to, among other things, the greater microbial biodiversity of house dust in this habitat. This aspect is also reflected in the recommendations on animal husbandry, on which a differentiated statement was made: In families without a recognizable increased allergy risk, pet keeping with cats or dogs should not generally be restricted. Families with an increased allergy risk or with children with already existing AD should not acquire a new cat – in contrast, however, dog ownership should not be discouraged. Interventions to reduce exposure to dust mite allergens in the home, such as the use of mite allergen-proof mattress covers (“encasings”), should be restricted to patients with already proven specific sensitization against house dust mite allergen. Children born by caesarean section have a slightly increased risk of asthma – this should be taken into account when advising on mode of delivery outside of emergency situations. Recent work also supports the recommendations on air pollutants: Active and passive exposure to tobacco smoke increase the risk of allergies, especially asthma, and should therefore be avoided. Exposure to nitrogen oxides, ozone, and small particles (PM 2.5) is associated with an increased risk, especially for asthma. Therefore, exposure to emissions of nitrogen oxides, ozone, and small particles (PM 2.5) should be kept low. The authors of this guideline are unanimously in favor of enacting appropriate regulations to minimize these air pollutants. There is no evidence that vaccinations increase the risk of allergies, but conversely there is evidence that vaccinations can reduce the risk of allergies. All children, including children at risk, should be vaccinated according to the current recommendations of the national public health institutes, also for allergy prevention. Conclusion: The consensus of recommendations in this guideline is based on an extensive evidence base. The update of the guideline enables evidence-based and up-to-date recommendations for the prevention of allergic diseases including asthma and atopic dermatitis.Correspondence to:
Prof. Dr. med. Matthias Kopp, Medizinbereich Kinder und Jugendliche, Insel Gruppe AG, Inselspital, Universität Bern, Freiburgstraße 15, 3010 Bern,
or
Prof. Dr. med. Eckard Hamelmann, Kinder-Zentrum Bethel, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, Universität Bielefeld, Burgsteig 13, 33617 Bielefeld
Email: [email protected]
Guideline
Guideline for allergological diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions
Knut Brockow, Gerda Wurpts, Axel Trautmann, Wolfgang Pfützner, Regina Treudler, Andreas J. Bircher, Randolf Brehler, Timo Buhl, Heinrich Dickel, Thomas Fuchs, Thilo Jakob, Julia Kurz, Burkhard Kreft, Lars Lange, Hans F. Merk, Maja Mockenhaupt, Norbert Mülleneisen, Hagen Ott, Johannes Ring, Franziska Ruëff, Bernhardt Sachs, Helmut Sitter, Bettina Wedi, Stefan Wöhrl, Margitta Worm, and Torsten Zuberbier
Add to Cart
Login
###ENGLISH_ABSTRACT_LINK###
###FREE_ENGLISH_ARTICLE_DOWNLIAD_LINK###
Volume 7 (2023) p. 122 - 139
Abstract
Allergologie select, Vol. 7/2023 (122-139)
Guideline for allergological diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions
Knut Brockow1, Gerda Wurpts2, Axel Trautmann3, Wolfgang Pfützner4, Regina Treudler5, Andreas J. Bircher6, Randolf Brehler7, Timo Buhl8, Heinrich Dickel9, Thomas Fuchs8, Thilo Jakob10, Julia Kurz4, Burkhard Kreft11, Lars Lange12, Hans F. Merk2, Maja Mockenhaupt13, Norbert Mülleneisen14, Hagen Ott15, Johannes Ring1, Franziska Ruëff16, Bernhardt Sachs2, Helmut Sitter17, Bettina Wedi18, Stefan Wöhrl19, Margitta Worm20, and Torsten Zuberbier20
1Department of Dermatology and Allergology Biederstein, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, 2Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Germany, Aachen Comprehensive Allergy Center (ACAC), University Hospital of RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, 3Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Allergy Center Mainfranken, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, 4Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, 5Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany, 6Facoltà di Scienze biomediche, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, and Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, 7Department of Dermatology, Münster University Hospital, Münster, 8Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, 9Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, St. Josef Hospital, University Hospital of the Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, 10Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital, Justus-Liebig University, Gießen, 11Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Hospital Halle, Halle (Saale), 12Pediatric Clinic, Marienhospital Bonn, Bonn, 13Documentation Center for Severe Skin Reactions, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, 14Asthma Allergy Center Leverkusen, Leverkusen, 15Children’s and Youth Hospital Auf der Bult, Hanover, 16Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Allergy Center, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 17Institute for Theoretical Surgery, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, 18Hanover Medical School, Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Venereology, Hanover, Germany, 19Floridsdorf Allergy Center (FAZ), Vienna, Austria, and 20Allergology and Immunology, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Correspondence to:
Prof. Dr. med. Knut Brockow, Department of Dermatology and Allergology at Biederstein, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Biedersteiner Straße 29, 80802 Munich, Germany
Email: [email protected]
Guideline
Diagnosis and treatment of Hymenoptera venom allergy
Franziska Ruëff, Andrea Bauer, Sven Becker, Randolf Brehler, Knut Brockow, Adam M. Chaker, Ulf Darsow, Jörg Fischer, Thomas Fuchs, Michael Gerstlauer, Sunhild Gernert, Eckard Hamelmann, Wolfram Hötzenecker, Ludger Klimek, Lars Lange, Hans Merk, Norbert K. Mülleneisen, Irena Neustädter, Wolfgang Pfützner, Wolfgang Sieber, Helmut Sitter, Christoph Skudlik, Regina Treudler, Bettina Wedi, Stefan Wöhrl, Margitta Worm and Thilo Jakob
Volume 7 (2023) p. 154 - 190
Abstract
Allergologie select, Vol. 7/2023 (154-190)
Diagnosis and treatment of Hymenoptera venom allergy
Franziska Ruëff1, Andrea Bauer2, Sven Becker3, Randolf Brehler4, Knut Brockow5, Adam M. Chaker6, Ulf Darsow5, Jörg Fischer7, Thomas Fuchs8, Michael Gerstlauer9, Sunhild Gernert10, Eckard Hamelmann11, Wolfram Hötzenecker12, Ludger Klimek13, Lars Lange10, Hans Merk14, Norbert K. Mülleneisen15, Irena Neustädter16, Wolfgang Pfützner17, Wolfgang Sieber18, Helmut Sitter19, Christoph Skudlik20, Regina Treudler21, Bettina Wedi22, Stefan Wöhrl23, Margitta Worm24 and Thilo Jakob25
1Department of Dermatology and Allergy, LMU University Hospital, Munich, 2Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, 3Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, 4Department of Dermatology, Münster University Hospital, Münster, 5Department of Dermatology and Allergology Biederstein, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, 6Department of Otorhinolaryngology Klinikum rechts der Isar, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, 7University Hospital for Dermatology and Allergology, Clinic Oldenburg, Oldenburg, 8Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, 9Clinic for Children and Adolescents, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, 10Pediatric Clinic, Marienhospital Bonn, GFO Kliniken, Bonn, 11Children’s Center Bethel, University Hospital OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany, 12Department of Dermatology, Kepler University Hospital, Medical Faculty of University Linz, Linz, Austria, 13Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, 14Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital of RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, 15Center for Asthma and Allergy, Leverkusen, 16Cnopfsche Paediatric Clinic, Nuremberg, 17Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, 18Hospital Wörth an der Donau, Wörth an der Donau, 19Institute for Theoretical Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, 20Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatological Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm) at the University of Osnabrueck, Osnabrueck, and BG Clinic Hamburg, Hamburg, 21University Leipzig Medical Faculty, Leipzig, 22Comprehensive Allergy, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany, 23Floridsdorf Allergy Center (FAZ), Vienna, Austria, 24Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, and 25Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Giessen, Justus Liebig University Gießen, Gießen, Germany
Hymenoptera venom (HV) is injected into the skin during a sting by Hymenoptera such as bees or wasps. Some components of HV are potential allergens and can cause large local and/or systemic allergic reactions (SAR) in sensitized individuals. During their lifetime, ~ 3% of the general population will develop SAR following a Hymenoptera sting. This guideline presents the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to SAR following Hymenoptera stings. Symptomatic therapy is usually required after a severe local reaction, but specific diagnosis or allergen immunotherapy (AIT) with HV (VIT) is not necessary. When taking a patient’s medical history after SAR, clinicians should discuss possible risk factors for more frequent stings and more severe anaphylactic reactions. The most important risk factors for more severe SAR are mast cell disease and, especially in children, uncontrolled asthma. Therefore, if the SAR extends beyond the skin (according to the Ring and Messmer classification: grade > I), the baseline serum tryptase concentration shall be measured and the skin shall be examined for possible mastocytosis. The medical history should also include questions specific to asthma symptoms. To demonstrate sensitization to HV, allergists shall determine concentrations of specific IgE antibodies (sIgE) to bee and/or vespid venoms, their constituents and other venoms as appropriate. If the results are negative less than 2 weeks after the sting, the tests shall be repeated (at least 4 – 6 weeks after the sting). If only sIgE to the total venom extracts have been determined, if there is double sensitization, or if the results are implausible, allergists shall determine sIgE to the different venom components. Skin testing may be omitted if in-vitro methods have provided a definitive diagnosis. If neither laboratory diagnosis nor skin testing has led to conclusive results, additional cellular testing can be performed. Therapy for HV allergy includes prophylaxis of reexposure, patient self treatment measures (including use of rescue medication) in the event of re-stings, and VIT. Following a grade I SAR and in the absence of other risk factors for repeated sting exposure or more severe anaphylaxis, it is not necessary to prescribe an adrenaline auto-injector (AAI) or to administer VIT. Under certain conditions, VIT can be administered even in the presence of previous grade I anaphylaxis, e.g., if there are additional risk factors or if quality of life would be reduced without VIT. Physicians should be aware of the contraindications to VIT, although they can be overridden in justified individual cases after weighing benefits and risks. The use of β-blockers and ACE inhibitors is not a contraindication to VIT. Patients should be informed about possible interactions. For VIT, the venom extract shall be used that, according to the patient’s history and the results of the allergy diagnostics, was the trigger of the disease. If, in the case of double sensitization and an unclear history regarding the trigger, it is not possible to determine the culprit venom even with additional diagnostic procedures, VIT shall be performed with both venom extracts. The standard maintenance dose of VIT is 100 µg HV. In adult patients with bee venom allergy and an increased risk of sting exposure or particularly severe anaphylaxis, a maintenance dose of 200 µg can be considered from the start of VIT. Administration of a non-sedating H1-blocking antihistamine can be considered to reduce side effects. The maintenance dose should be given at 4-weekly intervals during the first year and, following the manufacturer’s instructions, every 5 – 6 weeks from the second year, depending on the preparation used; if a depot preparation is used, the interval can be extended to 8 weeks from the third year onwards. If significant recurrent systemic reactions occur during VIT, clinicians shall identify and as possible eliminate co-factors that promote these reactions. If this is not possible or if there are no such co-factors, if prophylactic administration of an H1-blocking antihistamine is not effective, and if a higher dose of VIT has not led to tolerability of VIT, physicians should should consider additional treatment with an anti IgE antibody such as omalizumab as off lable use. For practical reasons, only a small number of patients are able to undergo sting challenge tests to check the success of the therapy, which requires in-hospital monitoring and emergency standby. To perform such a provocation test, patients must have tolerated VIT at the planned maintenance dose. In the event of treatment failure while on treatment with an ACE inhibitor, physicians should consider discontinuing the ACE inhibitor. In the absence of tolerance induction, physicians shall increase the maintenance dose (200 µg to a maximum of 400 µg in adults, maximum of 200 µg HV in children). If increasing the maintenance dose does not provide adequate protection and there are risk factors for a severe anaphylactic reaction, physicians should consider a co-medication based on an anti-IgE antibody (omalizumab; off-label use) during the insect flight season. In patients without specific risk factors, VIT can be discontinued after 3 – 5 years if maintenance therapy has been tolerated without recurrent anaphylactic events. Prolonged or permanent VIT can be considered in patients with mastocytosis, a history of cardiovascular or respiratory arrest due to Hymenoptera sting (severity grade IV), or other specific constellations associated with an increased individual risk of recurrent and/or severe SAR (e.g., hereditary α-tryptasemia). In cases of strongly increased, unavoidable insect exposure, adults may receive VIT until the end of intense contact. The prescription of an AAI can be omitted in patients with a history of SAR grade I and II when the maintenance dose of VIT has been reached and tolerated, provided that there are no additional risk factors. The same holds true once the VIT has been terminated after the regular treatment period. Patients with a history of SAR grade ≥ III reaction, or grade II reaction combined with additional factors that increase the risk of non response or repeated severe sting reactions, should carry an emergency kit, including an AAI, during VIT and after regular termination of the VIT.Correspondence to:
Prof. Dr. med. Franziska Ruëff, Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, und Allergologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Frauenlobstraße 9-11, 80337 Munich, Germany,
Email: [email protected]
