Int. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Volume 64 (2026) - March (115 - 121)

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of two regadenoson hyperaemic stress imaging injections in healthy Chinese subjects
Yi Liu1, Cao-Yang Wang1, Hai-Wen Wang1, Ming-Qing Xu1, Hong-Wen Zhang1, Li-Jun Xie1, Juan Chen1, Chen Zhou1, Lu-Ning Sun1, 2, Yong-Qing Wang1, 2
1 Research Division of Clinical Pharmacology, First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, and 2 School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

Add to Cart    

 

DOI 10.5414/CP204644

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated and compared the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of regadenoson injection (test) and regadenoson original injection (Lexiscan, reference) in healthy Chinese subjects.
Materials and methods: In a randomized, positive-control, single-center, single-dose study, 24 healthy Chinese subjects were divided into test and reference groups (12 subjects each). Subjects in the test group received a single bolus of test drug (0.4 mg/5 mL), while the reference group received the same dose of reference drug. Blood and urine samples were collected before and after drug administration, and regadenoson concentrations were quantified using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).
Results: No serious adverse events (AEs) occurred. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two preparations. The pharmacokinetic parameters, including maximum concentration (Cmax), the area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0–t), and the area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0–∞), were assessed to compare the pharmacokinetic of two regadenoson preparations. The test/reference geometric mean ratios of Cmax, AUC0–t, and AUC0–∞ were 102.84, 99.16, and 99.77%, respectively. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of AUC0–t and AUC0–∞ fell within 0.8 – 1.25, but the 90% CIs of Cmax did not. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were measured to compare the pharmacodynamics of the two preparations. The test and reference drugs had similar HR responses (63.22 ± 38.45% vs. 37.50 ± 16.96%), systolic BP response (4.81 ± 13.73% vs. –3.83 ± 12.29%), and diastolic BP response (–7.75 ± 12.84% vs. –16.13 ± 9.85%), p > 0.05. After adjusting the weight of males and females, there were significant differences in Cmax, AUC0–t, AUC0–∞, T1/2, Vss, λz, Ae%, p < 0.05.
Conclusion: The test drug demonstrated similar pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics as the reference drug. Additionally, it was well-tolerated and safe in healthy Chinese participants. Sex may influence regadenoson pharmacokinetics.

Author Details

Authors

Departments

  • 1 Research Division of Clinical Pharmacology, First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, and
  • 2 School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

Address

Yong-Qing Wang, PhD
or
Lu-Ning Sun, PhD
Research Division of Clinical Pharmacology
First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing 210009, China
Email: [email protected]; [email protected]

Citation

Yi Liu, Cao-Yang Wang, Hai-Wen Wang, Ming-Qing Xu, Hong-Wen Zhang, Li-Jun Xie, Juan Chen, Chen Zhou, Lu-Ning Sun, Yong-Qing Wang.Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of two regadenoson hyperaemic stress imaging injections in healthy Chinese subjects. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2026; 64: 115-121. doi: 10.5414/CP204644. Pubmed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41424325/; PMID: 41424325.

###article_not_exists_msg###

Shopping Overview

Shopping Overview
Type Qtty Discount VAT Price
Your basket is empty
View Cart