Pharmacokinetic, bioequivalence, and safety assessments of two brands of 30-mg nifedipine controlled-release formulations in Chinese healthy subjects
Huan Lu1, Fei Zhou1, Cuijie Rui2, Hen You2, Wenhao Zhang3, Yaxin Zhang1, 6, Juefang Ding4, Shunbo Zhao5, Qiang Wu1, 6
1 Phase I Clinical Trial Ward, Second Affiliated Hospital, Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui, 2 Qingdao Huanghai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Nanjing, 3 Department of Clinical Medical, First Clinical Medical College, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 4 Nanjing Jining Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd., 5 Nanjing Kelitai Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing, and 6 Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui, China
DOI 10.5414/CP204605
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to analyze the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics, safety, and bioequivalence (BE) of a test (T) preparation of a nifedipine controlled-release tablet and the reference (R) drug (Adalat GTIS) in Chinese study participants in the context of fasting and postprandial states.
Materials and methods: An open-label, single-center, randomized, single-dose, two-period study was designed including two separate arms, one with administration under fasting conditions and one with administration under postprandial conditions (high-fat, high-calorie breakfast). After oral administration, the nifedipine concentrations in plasma were quantitatively analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) at regular intervals. Primary PK parameters, including the area under the concentration curve from 0 to infinity (AUC0–∞), the area under the concentration profile from 0 to the last measurable concentration time (AUC0–t), and maximal measured plasma concentration (Cmax) were log-transformed with BE limits of 80 – 125% to evaluate BE. All adverse events (AEs) were wholly supervised.
Results: The PK profiles of the T and R formulations were comparable to each other under both fasting and postprandial conditions. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the AUC0–∞, AUC0–t, and Cmax were 92.69 – 106.06%, 93.32 – 107.05%, and 99.53 – 116.71%, respectively, under the fasting state. The 90% CIs of the AUC0–∞, AUC0–t, and Cmax were 105.05 – 117.40%, 105.43 – 117.82%, and 102.66 – 116.30%, respectively, in the postprandial arm. 47 cases of drug-associated AEs were noted in the entire research.
Conclusion: Under both the fasting and postprandial states, the two nifedipine controlled-release formulations were bioequivalent and safe in healthy Chinese subjects.
Author Details
Authors
Departments
- 1 Phase I Clinical Trial Ward, Second Affiliated Hospital, Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui,
- 2 Qingdao Huanghai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Nanjing,
- 3 Department of Clinical Medical, First Clinical Medical College, Anhui Medical University, Hefei,
- 4 Nanjing Jining Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd.,
- 5 Nanjing Kelitai Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing, and
- 6 Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui, China
Address
Qiang Wu
Phase I Clinical Trial Ward
Second Affiliated Hospital
Bengbu Medical University
Bengbu, 233080, China
Email:
[email protected]
Citation
Huan Lu, Fei Zhou, Cuijie Rui, Hen You, Wenhao Zhang, Yaxin Zhang, Juefang Ding, Shunbo Zhao, Qiang Wu.Pharmacokinetic, bioequivalence, and safety assessments of two brands of 30-mg nifedipine controlled-release formulations in Chinese healthy subjects
. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024;
62:
486-
496.
doi: 10.5414/CP204605.
Pubmed:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39078055/;
PMID: 39078055.