Int. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Volume 59 (2021) - June (478 - 484)

Pharmacokinetic comparison between tablet of varenicline tartrate and orally disintegrating film of varenicline salicylate in healthy subjects

Eunwoo Kim1, Jun Gi Hwang1, 2, Su Jun Park3, Ji Young Han3, Young-Sim Choi2, Se-Rin Park2, Kyung-Sang Yu1, Min Kyu Park2, SeungHwan Lee1, 4
1 Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, 2 Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, 3 CTCBIO Inc., Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, and 4 Clinical Trials Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Add to Cart  

 

DOI 10.5414/CP203953

Abstract

Objective: Varenicline is an efficacious aid for smoking cessation. In this study, the pharmacokinetics and safety were compared between film-coated tablets of varenicline tartrate (reference drug) and the newly developed orally disintegrating films of varenicline salicylate (test drug), both of them contained 1 mg of varenicline.
Materials and methods: A randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-sequence, two-period crossover study was conducted in healthy male subjects. Serial blood samples were obtained for up to 72 hours in each period, with a washout period of 7 days or more. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using the noncompartmental method. Safety profiles were assessed throughout the study.
Results: A total of 28 subjects completed the study. The plasma varenicline concentration-time profiles were similar for the two study drugs. The maximum plasma varenicline concentration (Cmax) was 5,768.95 ng/L (mean) and 5,780.55 ng/L for the test drug and reference drug, respectively. The areas under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable time point (AUC0–t) were 94,086.30 h×ng/L and 89,958.55 h×ng/L for the test drug and reference drug, respectively. The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of the test drug to the reference drug for Cmax and AUC0–t were 0.9955 (0.9488 – 1.0444) and 1.0449 (0.9848 – 1.1088), respectively, which fell within the bioequivalence range of 0.8 – 1.25. There was no difference in safety between the study drugs.
Conclusion: The pharmacokinetics and safety profiles were similar between the two study drugs. The orally disintegrating film of varenicline salicylate can be an alternative to varenicline tartrate tablets.

Author Details

Authors

Departments

  • 1 Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul,
  • 2 Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do,
  • 3 CTCBIO Inc., Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, and
  • 4 Clinical Trials Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Address

SeungHwan Lee, 
MD, PhD
Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital
101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu,
Seoul 03080, 
Republic of Korea
Email: [email protected]

Log in for Subscribers

Citation

Eunwoo Kim, Jun Gi Hwang, Su Jun Park, Ji Young Han, Young-Sim Choi, Se-Rin Park, Kyung-Sang Yu, Min Kyu Park, SeungHwan Lee. Pharmacokinetic comparison between tablet of varenicline tartrate and orally disintegrating film of varenicline salicylate in healthy subjects
. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021; 59: 478-484. doi: 10.5414/CP203953. Pubmed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33704052/; PMID: 33704052.

###article_not_exists_msg###

Warenkorb Übersicht

Warenkorb Übersicht
Typ Anz Rabatt MwSt Preis
Der Warenkorb ist leer
Ihr Warenkorb