Treatment of antibody-mediated rejection of kidney grafts with bortezomib and/or rituximab compared to standard regimen: experience of Slovene National Center
Teja Oblak1, Jelka Lindič1, Jakob Gubenšek1, 2, Radoslav Kveder1, Andreja Aleš Rigler1, Andrej Škoberne1, Željka Večerić Haler1, Špela Borštnar1, Nuša Avguštin1, Rafael Ponikvar1, 2, Gregor Mlinšek1, Dušan Ferluga2, 3, Nika Kojc2, 3, Uroš Godnov4, Damjan Kovač1
1 Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Ljubljana, 2 Faculty of Medicine, 3 Insititute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, and 4 Faculty of Management, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia
DOI 10.5414/CNP88FX21
Abstract
Background: The aim of our study was to determine outcomes of standard treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) of kidney grafts as compared to the addition of bortezomib or rituximab. Methods: The cohort of this retrospective study included patients treated for ABMR of kidney grafts at our national center in the period of 2005 – 2017, divided into two groups: standard (ST) group treated standardly with plasmapheresis or immunoadsorption, intravenous immunoglobulins, and corticosteroids, and BR group treated with the addition of bortezomib and/or rituximab. Patient and graft survival at 2 years was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method, and predictors of graft survival were analyzed by Cox regression. Results: There were 78 patients with ABMR (48 in the ST group, 30 in the BR group), 41 (53%) were men, mean age 49.5 ± 13.8 years. In ST and BR, respectively, mean serum creatinine was 267 ± 164 and 208 ± 112 µmol/L (p = 0.088), donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were positive in 75% and 97% (p = 0.022), and ABMR was acute in 50% and 33% (p = 0.149). Patient survival at 2 years was 89% in the ST and 100% in the BR group (p = 0.125). Cumulative proportion of kidney graft survival at 1 and 2 years was 67% and 53% in the ST group and 73% and 48% in the BR group, respectively, (p = 0.641). Chronic ABMR (HR 5.22, p = 0.004) was significant, while dialysis dependency at biopsy (HR 3.28, p = 0.072), serum creatinine at kidney biopsy (HR 1.003, p = 0.082), and presence of DQ-DSA (HR 3.37, p = 0.062) were borderline significant predictors of worse graft outcome. Infections were relatively common in both groups, with a trend towards more rehospitalizations due to infections in the first 6 months after treatment in the BR group (p = 0.066). In 5 patients (17%), treatment with bortezomib was discontinued prematurely due to cytopenia. Conclusions: Bortezomib or rituximab, added to standard treatment, did not significantly improve kidney graft survival and was also not associated with significant side effects, except cytopenia in some cases. Treatment of acute ABMR resulted in better graft survival than chronic ABMR.
Author Details
Authors
Departments
- 1 Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Ljubljana,
- 2 Faculty of Medicine,
- 3 Insititute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, and
- 4 Faculty of Management, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia
Address
Assoc. Prof. Damjan, Kovač, MD, PhD
Department of Nephrology
University Medica Centre Ljubljana
Zaloška cesta 7, 1525 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Email:
[email protected]
Citation
Teja Oblak, Jelka Lindič, Jakob Gubenšek, Radoslav Kveder, Andreja Aleš Rigler, Andrej Škoberne, Željka Večerić Haler, Špela Borštnar, Nuša Avguštin, Rafael Ponikvar, Gregor Mlinšek, Dušan Ferluga, Nika Kojc, Uroš Godnov, and Damjan Kovač.Treatment of antibody-mediated rejection of kidney grafts with bortezomib and/or rituximab compared to standard regimen: experience of Slovene National Center. 2017; 88: 91-96. doi: 10.5414/CNP88FX21.