Int. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Volume 55 (2017) - February (171 - 176)

Bioequivalence of two formulations of pregabalin 150-mg capsules under fasting conditions in healthy male subjects

Hyun Lee1,2, SeungHwan Lee2, Sung-Vin Yim3, Bo-Hyung Kim3, 4
1 Program in Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Program in Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Department of Transdisciplinary Studies, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, 2 Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, 3 Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, and 4 East-West Medical Research Institute, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, Korea

Add to Cart  

 

DOI 10.5414/CP202698

Abstract

Background: Pregabalin binds to the α2δ auxiliary subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels, which are widely distributed throughout the central and peripheral nervous systems and modulate calcium-dependent neurotransmitter release. Pregabalin is indicated for the treatment of peripheral and central neuropathic pain, partial seizures with or without secondary generalization, and treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the bioequivalence of two different formulations of pregabalin 150-mg capsules in healthy Korean male subjects under fasting conditions. Methods: This bioequivalence study was based on an open-label, single-dose, randomized, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover design with a washout period of 7 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation were collected up to 24 hours postdose. Plasma concentrations of pregabalin were determined using a validated LC-MS/MS method. PK parameters were determined using noncompartmental analysis. Bioequivalence was assumed if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the test/reference ratios of log-transformed Cmax and AUClast values met the bioequivalence criteria specified by Korean regulatory guidelines (90% CI 0.8 – 1.25). Results: The extent of exposure in terms of AUClast amounted to 26,018.3 – 3,580.8 µg×h/L for the test formulation and 25,680.2 ± 3,083.6 µg×h/L for the reference formulation. Cmax reached values of 4,782.7 ± 1,124.2 µg/L and 4,654.0 ± 911.4 µg/L for the test product and reference product, respectively. The geometric mean ratio and 90% CIs of the test product to the reference product were 1.0132 (0.9862 – 1.0351) for AUClast and 1.0153 (0.9351 – 1.1044) for Cmax, which were well within the range necessary to establish bioequivalence (90% CI 0.8 – 1.25). Conclusions: The bioequivalence between test and reference formulations under fasting conditions was confirmed both in terms of the rate and extent of absorption.


Author Details

Authors

Departments

  • 1 Program in Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Program in Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Department of Transdisciplinary Studies, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology,
  • 2 Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital,
  • 3 Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, and
  • 4 East-West Medical Research Institute, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, Korea

Address

Bo-Hyung Kim, MD, PhD
Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Kyung Hee University College of Medicine and Hospital
23 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu,
Seoul 130-872, Korea
Email: [email protected]

Log in for Subscribers

Citation

Hyun Lee, SeungHwan Lee, Sung-Vin Yim, Bo-Hyung Kim.Bioequivalence of two formulations of pregabalin 150-mg capsules under fasting conditions in healthy male subjects
. 2017; 55: 171-176. doi: 10.5414/CP202698.

###article_not_exists_msg###

Shopping Overview

Shopping Overview
Type Qtty Discount VAT Price
Your basket is empty
View Cart